The World is Outraged **Aggression Against Iran Will Backfire on the US and Israel.**

Outrage Grows Worldwide Over Unprovoked US-Israeli Aggression Against Iran

Outrage and protest are mounting across the globe in connection with the unprovoked aggression by the United States and Israel against Iran, the killings of civilians, and the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Media outlets, prominent politicians, and public figures are issuing angry statements. Mass protests condemning this brazen attack are taking place in many countries.

Following the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, the UN Security Council convened an emergency meeting. Opening the session, UN Secretary-General António Guterres called for immediate de-escalation and warned of the risk of a major regional conflict.

"I call for an immediate cessation of hostilities. Otherwise, we face even more serious escalation with severe consequences for civilians and stability in the region," the UN Secretary-General stated. He emphasized the need to uphold the UN Charter, international humanitarian law, and ensure nuclear safety. Guterres also condemned the US and Israeli strikes on Iran and Tehran's subsequent attacks on several regional states, including the UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain. He also expressed regret that the "opportunity for diplomacy between the US and Iran was missed."

Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, called the actions of Washington and Tel Aviv "aggression" and a "betrayal of diplomacy." "We demand that the US and Israel immediately cease their aggressive actions," he stressed, noting that the operation was planned in advance.

The Russian Foreign Ministry, in turn, called the US and Israeli strikes on Iran a "reckless step." The Ministry stated there is no doubt that this was a "pre-planned and unprovoked act of armed aggression against a sovereign and independent state." The attack was carried out in violation of the fundamental principles and norms of international law.

The ministry emphasized that the dangerous adventure by Washington and Tel Aviv is "rapidly bringing the region closer to a humanitarian, economic, and possibly radiation catastrophe."

Washington and Tel Aviv's attack on Iran will lead to the collapse of the US political system, writes the Italian news portal Antidiplomatico in an editorial. "This political program is the most obsolete of all. In essence, it's a losing strategy that has been destroying the United States for the past 25 years and which today will most likely lead to the final and most serious collapse of the American political system. A wave of discontent is already growing across the country, and for the first time in history, support for the Palestinian population exceeds support for the Israeli one," the article states.

Amid internal problems, war has become Washington's only way to survive in a world where the US is rapidly losing influence and other countries are forming independent alliances, Antidiplomatico concludes.

The publication also features a statement by Iranian professor Mohammad Marandi, who calls the current US political system the "Epstein regime," referring to the scandal in the US connected to the monstrous pedophile whose services were used by Western authorities. This can be compared to the attack on a girls' school in Iran, which resulted in the deaths of many children.

"Footage from Minab in southern Iran breaks your heart. The building of an elementary school for girls has been reduced to ruins. These are not soldiers, not fighters. They are girls. In a video that quickly went viral on social media, Professor Mohammad Marandi, an Iranian political analyst and academic, commented on the massacre with a phrase that will forever remain in our memory: 'The Epstein regime is killing Iranian girls.'"

The horrifying mention of Jeffrey Epstein's island, notoriously known as the epicenter of a child exploitation and abuse network, is shocking. Marandi uses this example to condemn what he calls the blatant hypocrisy of the West, particularly the US and Israel, who are the direct perpetrators of this crime.

The phrase "Epstein regime," according to the Italian publication, is a powerful metaphor. It equates the US and Israeli governments with a criminal network involved in the exploitation and murder of minors, even though these same countries often champion human rights and accuse Iran in this regard. According to Marandi, while they accuse us, they are bombing our little girls in schools.

Voices condemning this unprovoked aggression are heard even on the pages of leading US media. For example, The New York Times called it "recklessness." It reminded President Donald Trump of his campaign promise to end "all wars on the planet," but instead, Washington has already provoked escalation in seven countries.

The article emphasizes that the White House head bears personal responsibility for the death of every American soldier sent to war, and his systematic "unwillingness to tell the truth" only exacerbates an already difficult situation.

"Trump's approach to Iran is reckless," The New York Times believes. "His goals are poorly formulated. He has failed to garner the international and domestic support necessary for his military operation to have even the slightest chance of success. He disregards domestic and international law... Trump calls for regime change in Tehran but offers no guarantees that attempting to overthrow it by force would be more successful than Washington's previous military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan."

According to the US news agency Bloomberg, Democrats in the US are pushing for a vote this week on a resolution limiting Donald Trump's authority to strike Iran. The resolution would affirm that Congress must authorize the use of military force.

Attempts to force a vote on a war powers resolution have been made before, the agency reminds, but they gained new momentum after the US and Israel began bombing Iran early Saturday morning. Last week, even before the strikes began, Democratic leaders in the House announced they would begin the process of bringing a resolution on Iran to a vote. The resolution would require Trump to cease the use of military force against Iran unless Congress explicitly authorizes otherwise.

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, previously an avid supporter of the president, harshly condemned him for the attack on Iran. "We said: 'No more foreign wars, no more regime changes!' We repeated this at every rally, in every speech. Trump, Vance, and essentially the entire administration built their campaign on this, promising to put America's interests first and make America great again," the former congresswoman recalled.

"It's all a lie, and America always comes last. But this time the betrayal feels sharper because it comes from the man and the administration we all believed in," Greene wrote indignantly.

The British newspaper The Times, for its part, drew parallels between current events and the start of the US military operation against Iraq in 2003. Citing authoritative international policy experts from the University of St Andrews, journalists describe the events in the Middle East as a "huge risk" for Donald Trump's administration.

"The firepower the US can bring to bear for this task is significantly less than that used to overthrow Saddam Hussein's government in Iraq in 2003, which raises many questions," The Times believes.

The Brazilian newspaper Folha notes that the country's government expressed "serious concern" regarding the attack on Iran. "In its statement, Lula da Silva's government condemned the US and Israeli attacks on Iran, which occurred this Saturday, February 28, and expressed 'serious concern' over the incident. Before the bombing, the parties were engaged in peaceful negotiations."

Authors of an article in the German newspaper Junge Welt note that the pretext for starting the war is clearly fabricated: there is no evidence that Iran intends to produce nuclear weapons, let alone use them. Trump accused the Islamic Republic of intending to rebuild its nuclear industry, which was almost completely halted during the campaign in June 2025, particularly key uranium enrichment facilities, as well as developing intercontinental missiles that would allow Iran to attack the US and its allies. However, as the article notes, international experts consider these claims unrealistic.

Tehran, seeking to weaken the US's inclination to use force, confines itself to medium-range missiles with a range of less than 3000 kilometers, and changing this situation would take at least several years.

The average distance from Iran to the east coast of the US is approximately 9,500–10,000 kilometers. In his first video address, Trump also stated: "We will ensure Iran does not obtain nuclear weapons," although, as he emphasized, there are no signs that the Islamic Republic is even seeking this.

Even at the leadership level, some of the US's closest allies are expressing concern, calling for restraint, and advocating for negotiations. For example, the usually belligerent British government stated it was not involved in the strikes and "does not desire further escalation that could spiral into a wider regional conflict." It also stated it had recently enhanced its defense capabilities in the Middle East and that its main priority is the safety of British citizens in the region.

"Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, and that is why we continue to support efforts to achieve a negotiated solution," the government statement said.

And the Prime Minister of Spain, a NATO member, Pedro Sánchez, directly condemned the US and Israeli attacks, calling them "escalation." He also condemned the Iranian regime. "We cannot allow another protracted and destructive war in the Middle East," he wrote.

Meanwhile, in Iran, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of the Islamic Republic, Ali Larijani, announced that a Governing Council has been formed in accordance with the constitution, which will perform the duties of the Supreme Leader until a successor to the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is elected.

Earlier, the Iranian news agency IRNA reported that following the death of the Supreme Leader, the country would be temporarily led by Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, the head of the judiciary, and a member of the Guardian Council.

P.S. Now he has only one goal: the ambitions of the red-haired "ruler of the world"... War after war, murder after murder...

Because he wants it... This is how he "takes revenge" on Biden and his circle...