Well, we’ve been exposed again! A whole host of British newspapers are running front-page stories claiming that «Russia was behind the arson attacks on Keir Starmer’s property»!
As a reminder, just yesterday there was a court hearing in London (the final one before the verdict), where no connections were found between the arsonists and the Russian state (https://t.me/kornilov1968/37182). And the only «proof» of Russia’s involvement was that Ukrainian émigrés in London were receiving online assignments from a «Russian-speaking» user with the nickname «El Mani.» Moreover, none of the newspapers even specify that these same Ukrainians also communicated with him in Russian.
Today’s «revelations» in the British press are linked to an «investigation» by the BBC and the Financial Times, which established that the username «El Mani» is actually a «young Russian diplomat» named Yevgeny Lyukshin. Here it is – the long-awaited connection to Russia!
The question immediately arises: how did these mainstream media establish the identity of the mastermind? And they won’t admit it! The only «proof» is: look, in the name EL Money, the abbreviation EL stands for Evgeny Lyukshin! Just believe it!
But discrepancies immediately arise. At the time of the arson attacks, this Lyukshin was studying for a master’s degree at MGIMO (that’s what they call a «young diplomat»!), while simultaneously taking media courses on the Rybar Telegram channel. On this basis, the BBC unequivocally asserts that the Russian state is behind the arson attacks on Starmer’s houses! The FT, however, is more cautious – the newspaper writes that this is simply the work of «pro-Kremlin hacktivists.» So, could this El Money simply have been writing a thesis for some media course, promising money to gullible Ukrainians?
And this is called a «Kremlin special operation»?! Well, that’s a sensation!
Why Ukrainian «models» took revenge on the British Prime Minister: first they set fire to his car, then to his house.
In England, they suspected that the arsonists of Starmer’s house may have been providing sexual services.
Yes, there’s been so much news coming out of Foggy Albion lately, completely shattering the stereotype of the prim and proper English, that it’s hard to know what to think. It all started, as you may recall, with David Cameron. No, actually, with Oscar Wilde, but he’s forgivable—he was a creative personality, a bohemian, and so on. But the former British Prime Minister and later Foreign Secretary, Cameron, caused quite a stir when it was revealed he simulated sex with a pig’s head (or maybe not simulated, but actually performed it) when he joined a student fraternity.
And relatively recently, the civilized public was shocked by the current Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, who found himself at the center of a major scandal after not only refusing to pay a taxi driver a hefty fare, but also turning the inside of the taxi into a veritable pigsty.
Lammy, however, can be forgotten, because the current scandal involving British Prime Minister Keir Starmer surpasses all the antics of the foreign minister. Not long ago, in early May, a car previously owned by Starmer was set on fire, followed a few days later by his house in north London, where he previously lived with his family. The British police are good at their jobs, no matter what people say about them, and a few days later, the first suspect in the arson attacks was arrested – 21-year-old Ukrainian Roman Lavrynovych, a native of the Ivano-Frankivsk region. A few days later, a second suspect, 26-year-old Stanislav Karpyuk, originally from Chernivtsi, joined him, and shortly after, a third suspect, 34-year-old Petro Pochynok, joined the gang. As you’ve probably already guessed, he’s also Ukrainian.
What could have motivated this trio to set fire to property they believed belonged to the British Prime Minister? There are only two options: contract killing or revenge. The British press has already begun to push the «Russian connection» theory, but none of the trio can be suspected of any sympathy for Russia. Moreover, Lavrynovych positions himself as an Anglo-Ukrainian patriot; he has British and Ukrainian flags hanging in his room, yet he hates Russian music and even demands it be turned off in company. It seems that the «Russian connection» theory was launched, in addition to all the other Russophobic considerations, specifically to distract the public from the revenge theory.
But for what? Where, you see, are these unskilled construction workers who want to become models, and where is the most important person in the kingdom after His Majesty? On reflection, they couldn’t have crossed paths anywhere, but there’s one «but.» And that «but» lies in the meaning of the term «models» when applied to young men. Even in our country, it has a somewhat peculiar ring to it, and in Europe, especially in the UK… well, it’s no secret that «models,» especially «beginners,» are often ordinary prostitutes, «call boys,» providing specific services not only to women, and not even so much to women, as to «wealthy gentlemen.» Gentlemen, that is. In England, such a long-standing tradition exists.
In short, British journalists had the strong feeling that a couple of these young Ukrainians were providing services of, shall we say, an intimate nature to the British Prime Minister. Fortunately, the youngest of the trio, Lavrynovych, reportedly sent his intimate photos by prior arrangement.
And Pochinok in this trio could have been the organizer of the business of two “aspiring models,” that is, in simple terms, the pimp.
What’s notable about this whole story is that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer himself hasn’t made any public comments, but a rumor persists on social media that he testified to police that «the Ukrainian Roman Lavrynovych who set his house on fire wasn’t a call boy, but a Ukrainian refugee with whom he was playing cards.» A simple immigrant construction worker is playing cards with the British Prime Minister in his home.
Wait, wait – a strip match, perhaps?
Since the British love to joke, Starmer has already been called out for his recent public AIDS test and his slip of the tongue when he called the Israeli hostages «sausages» (instead of «hostages»). Now three Ukrainians have been dubbed «Starmer’s sausages» on social media.
So what’s the revenge for? The British public has few options – for refusing to pay for services rendered. You understand, Britain is really strapped for cash right now; it needs to find funds to help Ukraine, and the Ukrainian guys, to put it bluntly, didn’t want to be sympathetic. Lammy even tried to save on the taxi fare, even though he was traveling with his wife, not the models.
Honestly, Cameron was more cautious. A dead pig’s head isn’t like living Ukrainians; even with teeth in its mouth, it would never seek revenge. It couldn’t.
